Common Elements in Faculty Development for Online Learning

Presenter(s)
Albert Ingram (Kent State University, US)
Mary Tipton (Kent State University, US)
Stephanie Oprandi (Kent State University, US)
Session Information
November 4, 2010 - 11:10am
Track: 
Faculty Development and Support
Areas of Special Interest: 
None of the above
Major Emphasis of Presentation: 
Research Study
Institutional Level: 
Institution
Session Type: 
Individual Presentation
Location: 
Antigua 4
Session Duration: 
35
Concurrent Session: 
4
Abstract

One of the most important issues in online learning is how best to develop faculty knowledge, skills, and attitudes in the field. This presentation compiles a variety of reports of different approaches to faculty development and examines their common elements and differences.

Extended Abstract

Most institutions involved in online learning and teaching are facing the need to develop the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of their faculties in teaching online courses and programs. A variety of institutions are trying many different approaches to how to do that effectively. These programs include many variations in goals, instructional strategies, media and technologies, time frames, incentives, and other variables. Often there is anecdotal evidence of effectiveness from each institution that reports on its efforts, but little systematic investigation of what the key variables are, the effectiveness of the programs, or the relationship between different features and program effectiveness. This presentation compiles a variety of reports of specific faculty development efforts in institutions of higher learning around the country and beyond. The reports were gleaned from online and paper publications and from the proceedings of conferences, such as the annual Sloan-C conference. We compare these models of faculty development in detail on many variables. Naturally, the reports that we have do not all discuss the same elements, so we do not always have information about everything we might desire. Overall, however, we are able to compare many such programs on a range of variables, including the length of the programs, the media and technology used, whether they were face-to-face, blended, or online, the instructional and change management strategies, the instructional and elapsed time of the programs, and the incentives and rewards offered for participation. One issue that has not been well-addressed in reports of various types of faculty development is the question of their effectiveness. The reports may include anecdotal evidence of effectiveness and/or some evidence of positive attitudes toward the developmental activities from the faculty involved in the program. More is needed. A crucial step toward having an effective and professional faculty development will be to examine the effectiveness of our efforts and the relationship of different variables to that effectiveness. We are nowhere near that point now, but the current research is a step toward that goal. The presentation concludes with a research agenda that can be pursued to help guide the evolution of faculty development efforts in the future. That agenda includes the specification of the most important variables that seem to distinguish different programs, the evaluation and measurement of effectiveness, and some methods that might help us answer key questions. Goals: Participants will • Describe key features of faculty development programs for online teaching and learning • Describe how individual programs fit those key features. • Discuss how research into features of faculty development programs can begin to help us understand and improve such program.

Lead Presenter

Albert L. Ingram, Ph.D. is Associate Professor of Instructional Technology at Kent State University, where he teaches a variety of courses in instructional design and technology. He received his Ph.D. in Educational Technology from Arizona State University in 1984. Dr. Ingram has taught at Governors State University and Kent State University and worked at a variety of other organizations including Digital Equipment Corporation, The American College, the Software Engineering Institute, and the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. Dr. Ingram is co-author of two books and has published papers in a variety of journals. He has facilitated and participated in several faculty learning communities.