Designing Online Performance Assessments: a Constructivist View

Presenter(s)
Thomas Zane (Western Governors University, US)
Session Information
November 5, 2010 - 11:10am
Track: 
Learning Effectiveness
Areas of Special Interest: 
None of the above
Major Emphasis of Presentation: 
Practical Application
Institutional Level: 
Multiple Levels
Session Type: 
Individual Presentation
Location: 
Curacao 2
Session Duration: 
35
Concurrent Session: 
8
Abstract
Constructivist learning theories offer meaningful guidance for designing and building online performance assessments. In this session, we will discuss how constructivist theory provides educators the underpinnings for designing pedagogically and psychometrically sound online performance assessments.
Extended Abstract
Constructivist learning theory already forms the base for many articles and other resources that help faculty design and build online courses. However, faculty have little to go on when it comes time to design and build performance assessments that fit the constructivist approach. There are many good reasons for this dearth of literature and other resources. First, using constructivist learning theories to generate guidelines for online performance assessment is not a straightforward exercise. While there are strong linkages between theory and practice when it comes to building multiple choice exams, little exists to guide performance task development. Second, psychometric (measurement-related) theory is not much help either. Measurement experts enjoy strong theory to practice linkages for objective exams, and these are in turn linked to learning theory. Yet there is still much in the way of disagreement in the measurement world about performance task assessment. Thus, faculty are left with little to go on except perhaps intuition and subjective experience. The author has spent the past 15 years developing linkages between constructivist learning theory and successful performance assessment. These linkages traverse the gaps between existing constructivist learning theory, psychometric theory, tenets of successful performance assessment—and most important—a set of real-world guidelines that faculty can use to build successful performance assessments. In this session, we will discuss how constructivist learning theory can inform performance assessment design. First, we will present concepts showing how the constructivist perspective fits as a framework for performance assessment. This will be followed by a brief discussion of interrelated constructivist learning theories and how the tenets of those theories inform assessment design by making connections between the theory and specific practices. We will spend the majority of the session presenting real-world guidelines with examples for designing and building solid performance assessments.
Lead Presenter
Dr. Thomas W. Zane is the Director of Assessment Quality and Validity at Western Governors University where he has been one of the principal architects of the assessment system, designer of the performance assessment methods, author of the standards and practices documentation, and senior psychometrician. During his time with WGU, he has directed the creation of assessment systems and instruments for measuring competency of candidates in the Business, Information Technology, Health Professions, and Teachers colleges. Dr. Zane’s credentials include a PhD in Measurement, an MLIS, and an MS in Research and Statistics. He teaches test development, psychometrics, and evaluation methods. He currently conducts a variety of validity-related studies to ensure the alignment, inter-rater reliability, quality, etc., of university assessment programs. Recent articles and presentations include Competency-Based Domain Definition; Constructivist Foundations of Performance Assessment; and A Pedagogy for Professional Reflection. Current interests include developing theory-based methods for measuring broad constructs such as competency, and professional reflection; creating defensible methods for building cost-effective performance measures; and discovering new approaches to validity and reliability.