2012 ET4Online Selection Criteria

The following rubric will be used to evaluate all proposals in the refereed proposal review process.

  • Do the title and abstract clearly describe the session?
  • Is the proposed topic timely and/or appropriate?
  • What are the session outcomes?
  • Will this session positively contribute to the conference and to the field?
  • Are the format and session type selected for the presentation the most appropriate to
  • the topic and format of the presentation?
  • Is the session designed to be interactive and engage the audience?
  • Are you sharing research data or assessment information during the session?

 

Specific Criteria:

  • Relevance to the conference
  • Clarity
  • Audience Appeal
  • Relevance to Research/Theory/Practice

 

Acceptance:

If your proposal is accepted, you will be asked to:

  • Register for the conference and pay the published fees
  • Edit all materials used in your session
  • Transmit your Power Point Slides, Handout (PDF files), data charts, and other