As online learning has exploded, the need for assessing the quality of on-line instruction has become critical. While the effectiveness of online pedagogy has been well documented, there are still vestiges of suspicion of the on-line modality on the part of faculty, administrators, and legislators. North Georgia College & State University has met the challenge of assessing online course quality by developing and implementing a process for internal peer review of online courses offered by the University. In this way, North Georgia has established a foundation for the development of high quality on-line courses and the improvement of existing classes.
This poster outlines the development of on-line learning at North Georgia and the process of implementing an internal peer review program for on-line classes. The evolution of both on-line learning and evaluation is presented. As with every new initiative, there have been key challenges, including support, communication, resistance to change, budget, and faculty autonomy that have been met and resolved along the way. Recommendations for others planning a similar program of course peer review are presented.
Goals:
1. Describe the process of development of a program for peer review of on-line courses using the Quality Matters Program Rubric.
2. Discuss the challenges encountered during implementation of the peer evaluation process.
3. Explain mechanisms for overcoming challenges identified during program development and implementation.
4. Identify recommendations for other institutions planning on-line course development and review.
