Using Net Promoter Score Surveys to Improve Online Student Services

Presenter(s)
Susan Malekpour (American InterContinental University, US)
Additional Authors
Steve Whitten (American InterContinental University, US)
Session Information
July 12, 2011 - 11:30am
Major Emphasis of Presentation: 
Effective Practice
Institutional Level: 
Universities and Four Year Institutions
Audience Level: 
All
Session Type: 
Cutting Edge 20 Minute Presentation
Location: 
California
Session Duration: 
20 Minutes
Concurrent Session: 
2-A
Virtual Session
Session Chair: 
Deborah Howei
Abstract
This session will focus on using Net Promoter Score (NPS) surveys of key stakholder groups to improve a service culture. Speakers will give examples from one institutions's three-year experience to show how the NPS concept can enhance quality improvement efforts and create institutional promoters.
Extended Abstract

The importance of developing a culture of service and institutional improvement is critical to the spirit of every Higher Education institution. Listening to and learning from key institutional stakeholders is essential to developing strategies that address constituent concerns. The Net Promoters Score (NPS) concept has been used by many businesses to understand and improve stakeholder loyalty. While satisfaction surveys are often used to gauge areas of strength and challenge, the NPS approach focuses on building loyalty through identifying stakeholders (students, faculty, staff, alumni, etc.) as promoters, passives, or detractors. Building on the work of Richard Owen and Laura Brooks, NPS asks the question, "Would you recommend [the institution] to a friend or colleague?" Based on the scaled and open-end responses to this question and when combined with analysis and conversation among faculty and staff members, help to determine root causes in relation to key issues and helps direct the strategies for developing action plans that lead to improved services and greater constituent loyalty. NPS can be used as one method in an institution's assessment toolkit. However, the NPS survey score alone does not replace than the data-driven conversation among faculty, administrators and staff regarding issues that are important to stakeholders. The conversation leads to specific action plans and, perhaps more importantly, to a changed culture that is more sensitive to the various needs identified by constituents. Although used extensively in business, the NPS approach is just beginning to be used in higher education. NPS aligns well with higher education's institutional effectiveness model of continuous quality improvement. The constituent-focused model positions the institution to address what matters most to stakeholders. Process improvements are prioritized through a careful analysis of constituent feedback. Developing action plans creates a culture of accountability centered on improving service excellence. In sum, a Net Promoter Score survey strategy is a powerful tool and process for identifying strengths and challenges, improving a culture of service excellence, and responding to stakeholder concerns with actions that demonstrate commitment to improvement. The NPS program was first implemented in May 2008 with students being surveyed twice per year and other constituencies such as faculty, staff and alumni being surveyed only once per year. Overall response rates from all groups and all surveys administered ranged from 15 to 42 percent. To initiate participation amongst all groups, an email invitation was sent to all stakeholder groups inviting them to participate in the NPS Survey online. The following issues will be addressed by the workshop: •Improving services provided to all constituencies •Improving institutional assessment, effectiveness and continuous quality improvement; •Developing and improving a culture of service excellence •Listening to and learning from constituencies served by the institution; •Deepening the institutional commitment and capacity to engage with and respond to the concerns of its constituencies; and •Determining the loyalty to and value placed on the services provided by the institution. The survey asks, "How likely are you to recommend the school to a friend or colleague?" Answers ranged from 0 (Not at all likely) to 10 (Extremely likely). An open-ended follow-up question asks, "What is the most important reason why you gave this score? In addition, another follow-up question asks, "Which of the following best describes the primary reason for your answer in the first question {Choose one}?" Answer options included: Admissions, Financial Aid, Student Advising, Registrar, Student Accounts, Academics, Classroom Experience, Faculty, Technology, Career Services, and Other. Since the survey is confidential, students were asked an additional question that addressed disclosure: "Would you like to be contacted regarding your responses on this survey?" If yes, students had the opportunity to provide contact information. As a result of the faculty and staff survey, several initiatives were developed to improve the employees' relationship with the University. For the student responses, University staff contacted each individual who requested follow-up. This process created a fruitful dialogue regarding the various issues raised by the students. From these conversations, and an analysis of the survey data, action plans were developed and have been implemented to "close the loop" on the process until the next round of surveys. Another outcome of the process is to communicate back to respondents the actions that have been taken as a result of their participation and comments. It is critical that a broad base of faculty and staff understand the importance of the project and commit to the goal of providing better services to all stakeholders, internal and external. The NPS initiative, as a part of ongoing institutional effectiveness efforts, enhances and reinforces the cycle of continuous improvement.

Lead Presenter

I have always been fascinated with learning since I was a child. As my educational process progressed, I began to realize the vast array of knowledge that existed which furthered my desire and aided me in developing an extensive ability to learn. This desire fueled my quest for knowledge within the classroom and in later years with online education. I have been working within various areas of Academia for the past 16 years. I started as a faculty member in 1995 and over this time period I held numerous positions including: Program Director, Program Chair, Dean of Academic Affairs and Senior Director of Institutional Effectiveness positions. I have been working in an online educational environment since 2005. I am also an executive member at American InterContinental University and continue to stay rooted in the classroom by teaching one to two online courses every quarter. I appreciate the opportunity to be a part of the online education process by being in the online classroom and the privilege to facilitate and learn concurrently. From my perspective, the online classroom is an interactive learning environment where each participant has an opportunity to contribute. As Administrators, I believe it is our responsibility to actively engage our online students, listen to their concerns and in essence close the loop to promote an interactive learning environment. I received my Bachelor of Science Degree in Medical Technology and earned my graduate degree in Clinical Microbiology from Northern Illinois University. I was employed as a Hematologist, Medical Technologist and as the Director of Clinical Laboratory. In conjunction with my work in the clinical setting, I also taught as an adjunct faculty member. My love for education continued to flourish both in and out of the classroom and at that point in my life I decided to alter my life path and pursue a degree in an area that I had always felt passionate about; education. I chose the field of Adult Education and I earned my Ed.D in Adult Education from National Louis University in Chicago. My dissertation topic was focused on Science Pedagogy and Constructivism. This topic allowed me to combine my real world experiences in teaching and the clinical environment into the classroom through the understanding of multiple learning styles that aid me in being creative and striving to always achieve a positive interactive learning environment.

Comments

Interesting

I really enjoyed learning about NPS, something I didn't really know before the presentation. It is always a good idea to get quality data to develop better programs.

 

--Mike Menchaca, Associate Professor, University of Hawaii at Manoa, mikepm@hawaii.edu