Discipline-Specific Online Writing Lab with 24/7 Access and Asynchronous Peer Tutoring

Award Winner: 
2004 Sloan-C Effective Practice Award
Author Information
Author(s): 
Julie Joki
Author(s): 
Rogue Community College
Institution(s) or Organization(s) Where EP Occurred: 
Rogue Community College
Effective Practice Abstract/Summary
Abstract/Summary of Effective Practice: 

The Rogue Community College Online Writing Lab is a unique, multi-discipline, online writing assistance resource designed to equalize access for all students, across all digital boundaries. Its design and content is flexible and transferable, and provides a cost-effective vehicle for addressing a variety of needs at myriad institutions.

Supporting Information for this Effective Practice
Evidence of Effectiveness: 

The initial pilot phase of OWL, launched in April, 2002, was primarily concerned with formative evaluation relative to site functionality and various user-interface issues. Based on the results of Pilot I, the project principals undertook a complete overhaul of the website, with specific attention on navigation, resource categorization, and cross-platform compatibility. We re-scripted the entire site, revising content layout and page design, along with the tutor/student interaction interface. The resulting OWL site is extremely user-friendly, almost completely free from technical glitches, and operates seamlessly across a multitude of user platforms. The second pilot phase of Rogue OWL was launched in January, 2004, starting with six participating community colleges across five states: Arkansas, California, Kansas, Oregon, and Wisconsin. Although participation has been purposefully limited, the OWL has tracked 1380 unique student users from January through March, 2004. Various evaluation measures, including random online surveys, automated stats package, and rubric-based writing assessment, have been utilized to assess effectiveness in several key areas: ease of use (includes navigation and gains in technological proficiency); scope (includes relevance and utility of discipline-specific resources); and perceived benefits (includes assessment of both content and tutor feedback on submitted work). Initial results of a rubric-based, double-blind assessment of writing gains are promising, and a more sophisticated (and statistically significant) study will commence in July, 2004. Other evaluation tools, including online surveys and questionnaires, reveal the following: Setting up your OWL account was: Very Simple = 72% Simple = 18% Typical = 9% Somewhat Difficult = 1% Very Difficult = 0% If you submitted a writing assignment to the OWL Tutors, did you revise your work based on their input? Yes = 57%; No = 3%; Did Not Use Tutors = 40%

 

How did you hear about OWL? Teacher = 73%; Friend = 2%; Writing Center = 8%; Counselor = 5%; Other = 12% Are you working towards a: One-Year Certificate = 5% Two-Year Degree = 38% Transfer Degree = 57% In addition, the following student and faculty comments are a sampling of those solicited from all OWL users, who were asked to respond to the question: What was the most useful aspect of OWL? Why? Student quotes: "It was easy to use-also, seems relevant to my work even outside of writing courses." "The OWL is not only easy and convenient to use, I found the resources very helpful in polishing my writing, and I will continue to use them in the future." "The most useful thing is that [tutors] do not fix the errors for you, but give you advice about changing them, so you can figure out on your own and learn from your mistakes." "All in all, I have found the OWL to be a useful and easy-to-operate resource. Registration was a simple process that took around two minutes, and was as well-documented and user-friendly as the rest of the system is." "Having the advice and feedback of tutors readily available is one of the main benefits for student users of the system. The system enables a student to send a piece of writing work to a tutor, who then looks at the piece and provides advice and recommendations for improvement." Faculty quotes: "The OWL is the best resource for students to see actual examples of documentation that will be required from them when working in the field. Moreover, through the OWL, students are able to get feedback/suggestions to improve the technical writing aspect of their work. At the same time, electronics instructors can focus on the technical accuracy." "I am a librarian and instructor. I have found all aspects of the OWL useful to promote to various program areas. I actually assign my written communication and oral communication students an assignment using the OWL. It is one of the better writing tools I have accessed. It is well laid out, easy to use and offers practical as well as reliable help for many program areas." "On-line teaching is here, and we NEED the OWL. Thanks for the many hours of guided tours, handouts, tutoring and coaching, both for me and my students." "Thank you for including our specialized writing needs on your site! I'm impressed with the helpfulness of the information - a real plus for my students. There are a number of links to other on-line writing sites, many specifically tailored to the needs of the writing professional. You've created an excellent resource for both me and my students! Bravo!!" "Quite simply, the OWL is the best thing I've seen in education in the past 20 years!"

How does this practice relate to pillars?: 

access: The Rogue Comunity College's Online Writing Lab (Rogue OWL) is a 24/7 online interactive writing support service, which provides writers' resources; research, writing, and document design guides across the curriculum; citation and documentation information; as well as asynchronous peer tutoring. The web-based nature of this program effectively removes time and place barriers for students, staff, and faculty-whether across the hall, or across the country. In addition to support for individual students, the OWL also equalizes writing assistance access for a multi-campus institution, without duplicating physical services at each satellite campus. The OWL guarantees access to resources to previously underserved populations, including those from economically disadvantaged regions. In developing the final site, special consideration was given to technical capabilities of student users. The OWL functions equally well, whether a user has sophisticated, updated technology, or relies on lower-end technology. (Note: many student users cannot afford new computers in addition to tuition, books, and fees, so we felt it was vital to compensate for low-end technology in our design strategy.) The OWL guarantees access to resources to traditional, multi-tasking students, as well as to nontraditional, part-time, and evening students, who are often unable to spend long periods of time on campus to receive assistance in physical writing labs. OWL also directly supports distance learners, who, although able to access online courses, have been previously denied equal access support services, specifically, writing assistance. Furthermore, the OWL directly responds to the writing needs of professional/technical students, with its extensive offerings of level-appropriate modules, tailored to individual discipline requirements, in a broad spectrum of fields, including: Electronic Engineering, Automotive Technology, Emergency Medical Technician, Manufacturing and Welding Technology, and Human Services. The OWL is the first writing lab in the nation to address professional technical field-specific writing expectations at the undergraduate level.

Estimate the probable costs associated with this practice: 

The initial development of content and technological infrastructure was funded by a 3-year FIPSE Comprehensive Program Grant. (The project is in its fourth and final year of development under a no-cost, one-year extension granted by FIPSE in November, 200.) The OWL, because its design is web-based, requires little (if any) investment in technical infrastructure by licensing institutions. This design strategy also eliminates the need for user e-mail accounts to access tutor comments on submitted work, as all communications transpire within the site itself. The OWL resides on a secure server, with full encryption capacity. The content is standardized and has been evaluated by both academicians and professionals in the field, thus it is not tailored to a specific institution's curriculum, creating a highly transferable body of information applicable to all undergraduate institutions, including community colleges, technical and vocational institutes, and universities. A highly-desirable administrative tool, however, allows licensing institutions to customize content-including adding, modifying, and deleting-to create a more institution-specific site. Because the content is so extensive (and student friendly), the OWL is a valuable educational tool even without staff tutors. Thus, the OWL could theoretically be utilized without any staffing expense. Of course, tutors are highly desirable, as students welcome (and respond quite positively to) feedback on their writing. We have embraced the peer tutor model since the OWL's inception, and have found peer tutoring not only cost effective (at less than 1/2 the cost of "professional" tutors), but also superior to "professional" tutors in establishing trusting relationships with students.

Contact(s) for this Effective Practice
Effective Practice Contact: 
Julie Joki, Rogue OWL Project Director
Email this contact: 
jjoki@roguecc.edu